From Roy Mathisen (of Bridport First)…….

Bridport Housing Crisis – Please Help

I am very concerned that so many younger people in Bridport are unable to afford to buy their own homes.  I also recognise that many people there are having to pay very high rents for accommodation in Bridport.

These high prices are the result of a simple fact.  Lack of supply.  If there is not sufficient supply of anything that people need then prices go up.  It is that simple.  Smaller homes in Bridport are too expensive for local younger people to buy because there are not enough houses of that type.  Privately rented accommodation is so expensive that tax payers appear to be paying out over £2,000,000 in Housing Benefit per year in Bridport for people who cannot afford to pay the rents for private accommodation!  That is because there is not enough low cost rental housing. I think that is outrageous.

This housing shortage is not just a local problem, it is a national problem.  The main cause is that up until the early 1980s Local Councils were building around 100,000 council houses a year. The Thatcher government decided to sell off council houses to their tenants and that was arguably a good thing.  The problem was that they also stopped giving the councils the money to build more council houses so the country has been losing 100,000 new homes each year for decades. Hence the current housing crisis. That is totally irresponsible!

I have done quite a lot of research into this and I feel that the new housing policies that have been devised for Bridport are flawed.  West Dorset District Council have prepared a Local Plan for West Dorset and Weymouth & Portland and this plan is almost certainly be accepted and implemented.  The housing provision for Bridport that is contained in the Plan simply does not address the housing needs if Bridport.

Bridport needs quite a lot more housing to cater for the needs of the younger people who already live there

It has to be the right type of housing in the right places and at the right prices.  The Local Plan DOES NOT DO THIS.

I have written a detailed paper on this problem and I have sent it to our MP, Oliver Letwin and to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Mr Greg Clark.  In this paper I have asked that a panel of experts be set up to look at the specific housing needs in Bridport and come up with ways building the right properties in the right places at the right prices.  For the people of Bridport.

Below is the Executive Summary of the paper I sent to Letwin and Clark.  I have also sent it to West Dorset District Council and to Bridport Town Council.  I am very grateful that Bridport Town Council responded positively. Council leader Cllr Sarah Williams said ‘This is a very interesting document that raises a number of issues.’ The full response is attached to this email.  That is very, very helpful.

Affordable Housing – beware!

A key point to be aware of is the term Affordable Housing. This appears a lot in articles about our housing crisis. Affordable Housing is in fact defined as being priced at 80% of the market rate.  Reducing rents or house prices in Bridport by 20% will not mean that lots more local people would be able to afford them. Anybody in Bridport will tell you that.  What we need is LOW COST housing !

So, I have done quite a lot of research into the housing needs in Bridport and I have sent my suggestions to Mr Letwin and Mr Clark in the hope that they will help.  What are the chances of me succeeding? Well as a solitary local citizen with no public profile then I estimate my chances of success as being nil.  Or even less than nil.

For there to be any chance of a constructive review of housing needs in Bridport taking place, a lot more people than just me need to ask for it.

I am asking you to read the work that I have done and decide whether or not you broadly agree with what I have discovered and what could be done about it.  You do not have to agree with absolutely everything of course.  If you broadly support what I think needs to be done then please will you do these two things.

  1. Write or email Mr Letwin and Mr Clark to tell them what you think.  It can be a long message or a short simple message.  Their email addresses are below.
  2. Send this email to all your local friends and ask them to email Mr Letwin and Mr Clark as well.  If you do that then it can become very powerful. For example, if you send this to ten of your friends and they also email Mr Letwin and Mr Clark then that would mean they would each get eleven emails.  If your ten friends send it to ten of their friends and they each send emails then that would make a hundred more emails plus the original eleven.  If those hundred people each send it to ten of their friends then that would make a thousand emails.  And if they all got ten of their friends to send emails then that would make ten thousand emails.  That is powerful!!  It is the old idea of a chain letter but it is so much easier by email.  The power of modern technology.  Use it!

 

  1. You could also write to the local press or to your local councillors.

 

  1. You could also email me to tell you what you have done then I have an idea of what is happening.

 

  1. Also, please let me know if you have any queries.

The email address for Mr Clark is greg@gregclark.co.uk

The email address for Mr Letwin’s Parliamentary Secretary, Mrs Angela Charles, is charlesa@parliament.co.uk

YOU MUST INCLUDE YOU NAME AND ADDRESS ON YOUR EMAIL TO PROVE THAT YOU LIVE IN MR LETWIN’S CONSTITUENCY

Below is a summary of the housing paper that I have sent.  The full paper is attached to this email.  Please read it and the other attachments on this email.

Thank you for reading this.  I hope you will take action.  If you do, then together we can make a difference.

Please do it as quickly as you can to help the people of Bridport to get a fair deal on housing.  They need your help.

Regards

Roy Mathisen

 

Executive Summary

  • There is a critical low cost housing shortage in Bridport.
  • Nearly 40% households in West Dorset have an income of £20,000 or less – probably a lot less.
  • This means that many residents are simply unable to afford to buy a home.  In addition there is insufficient low cost rental accommodation available so that 25% of rented properties attract housing benefit which suggests that around £15 million per year is spent on Housing Benefit in West Dorset. That need not happen.
  • House prices in Bridport are so high that they are almost high as similar properties within the M25 so younger people are leaving Bridport because higher London salaries enable them to get on the housing ladder there.  Bridport is losing a generation of its population because of its housing crisis.
  • That is completely wrong.
  • The draft Local Plan is still not approved and in place.  This means that the District Council are unable to turn down planning applications for housing. It is widely known that a developer intends to obtain planning permission for 760 houses on an area of outstanding natural beauty before the Local Plan is in place.
  • These houses are mainly middle income housing.  There is no evidence of any need for more of that type of housing.
  • There is a critical need for low cost homes.
  • This paper proposes that a Panel of professionals be set up to explore ways in which low cost housing be devised and delivered for Bridport using private sector funding.  This to be carried out in liaison with the Neighbourhood Planning process.
  • The above process could provide a model for similarly affected areas in the UK.

WDDC cabinet meeting….not to be missed !

Hi,

Just to say there is an important and probably ground-breaking Cabinet Executive meeting in Dorchester tomorrow (16th June), Tuesday, at 2.15pm where they will effectively I believe be recognising that the attempt to develop Charles St has failed once again and they will be deciding whether it is nevertheless worthwhile knocking down the Community Church at a cost of around £1 million to clear the ground (and make some more parking spaces available)

 

It seems particularly difficult to get a copy of the vital paper but it can be reached by clicking on:

www.dorsetforyou.com/committees/west

West Dorset Executive Committee

Executive Committee agendas and reports

2015 agendas

16 June 2015

Scroll down to the bottom of the agenda to ‘Charles St Phase 2’

This is the train hitting the buffer as we have predicted for 6 years. It’s awful. But I have to say it is at least something that the new Cabinet Leader (whose last comment before the election was ‘I have not heard it’s not going ahead’ ) appears now to be confronting it. It is the issue of course that comes up most often at our Petition signings.  I will be attending and hope there will be a good public group, though the issue has not been publicised at all in the local papers that I have seen.

John Grantham

 

From Bridport First…..

You can promise affordable housing but you never have to build it! It’s happening all over the country … here’s how …

The government has introduced a loophole in the law which can allow builders who had promised to include substantial numbers of affordable homes in a housing development to renege on that commitment.

Under a clause in the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013, developers can appeal to the Planning Inspectorate (PINS) if they believe that the affordable housing requirement made as part of a section 106 agreement renders a scheme unviable.

Don’t be fooled … Bridport needs affordable housing not empty promises …

From Robert Golden; Hallam Land consultation

To; Sarah Bevan Bsc (Hons), Msc, MRTP

Senior Planner

 Savills (on behalf of Hallam Land Group), UK
Dear Ms Bevan

Perhaps your company is well intentioned, but I imagine your main concern is to create profits for your board rather than to create a rich addition to Bridport.
This is only natural in the strange world we share.
There are a number of worrisome matters in your presentation.
The first is the mitigating adverbs used throughout implying you MAY do x, y or z. What is clear is how uncommitted your document is to the things which would help to hide these houses from the rest of us. Is the developer actually going to plant trees, gardens and grasses? Is there going to be a commons and a community centre and if so what will it contain, how big will it be, who will outfit it? Why is there an insistence to move St Mary’s to Vearse Farm? It seems to me, yanking it out of an already impoverished and underserved area and placing it in what looks to be a middle class areas of housing is a travesty of justice. Further, it is clear from research that Bridport needs affordable housing and not more retirement and second homes which your designs seem to hint at. Just how many ‘social houses’ will there be? And will they be of built to the same standards as the rest of the retirement houses? Why does the architecture bare no resemblance to our local vernacular? It reminds me of Mac houses in the States, a customised one format fits all imposition from people who have no sensitivity towards local materials and designs.
Are any of the houses going to have a small ecological footprint? Why are they being built on an area which, two summers ago, was flooded from heavy rainfall?
Are the increase in vital services -roads, school places and teachers, medical facilities- going to be externalised costs borne by local residents or is the developer going to help the town cope with the thousands of new citizens?
I have as yet not spoken to one person who is happy about this uninvited intrusion in our green belt of natural beauty because no one believes your new settlement will help the people of Bridport be housed. The assumption is that our young and poor will struggle even more to find places to live.
Of course, if the developers were to build fine houses for the young and poor, that would be a different matter.
Robert Golden
 

From Tina Ellen Lee; Hallam Land consultation

To; 

Sarah Bevan Bsc (Hons), Msc, MRTP
Senior Planner
Savills (on behalf of Hallam Land Group), UK
Dear Ms Bevan

I have just been sent your report on the Vearse Farm developments.

I don’t mind our town growing by over 3000 people over ten years but what I do mind is the middle class second home nature of this development and the appallingly lazy architecture.

I see no community or cultural centre nor any new facilities in the town to cope with the extra people.  I also see absolutely no social or affordable housing which is what this town needs, not second homes.  

We also don’t need any new supermarkets nor removal of car parks in the town centre.

What we need is real vision for the future of this town and I am not seeing this at Vearse Farm. Just an opportunity for a number of companies to make profit.

I am hoping that the Neighbourhood Plan will give the community of Bridport the chance to alter these plans to 
suit what this town needs rather than what is currently being imposed.

It is very sad that the process so far, which hasn’t been handled well by WDDC, has caused so much distress to the people of the town.  I am glad you sent this document because I was unable to see the exhibition at the Town Hall due to being away for work.  Everyone I know who has been to see the plans have expressed deep unhappiness.
 Finally the plan to remove St. Mary’s Primary School from the Skilling Estate will cause huge problems for the many disadvantaged families who live there and who at the moment can walk their children to school.  Many don’t have cars and there is no public transport system.  With the buses in this area being cut it seems no one has thought through the problems that this will cause.  Meanwhile St Mary’s is now being denied some of the benefits that are being given to the other primary schools because of its uncertain future e.g. the recent solar panel plan for schools.

I think there is some moral responsibility here that no one involved seems to be grasping, but then morality never goes hand in hand with profit. 
Yours

Tina Ellen Lee
 
 

WDDC; Bridport unitary petition signing …..

From John Grantham……

“As ever there is another challenge ahead and this one is for this Saturday  28th Feb, at Bucky Doo Square.

Could anyone reading this link, very kindly think whether they could please help? (It’s quite a wide-ranging list as I don’t know who would be interested in helping so please don’t be surprised at seeing your name on it!) Or could you recommend names of people who are disenchanted with Cabinet Govt to contact that you think might be ‘askable’ by me for this Saturday please? If the Dorchester experience is anything to go by there will be members of the public making special trips in to vote, (one man went back for his wife too, and then said he was thinking of going back again and bringing the budgerigar in to vote too!) so strongly do they feel about what has happened. Let’s be there to take their signatures. The target of 500 – on a less glacial day than we had in Dorchester where we got nearly 400 – with all this press publicity, should be clearly reachable and will stimulate other efforts…. This IS our chance to make a change…and already the opposition to it was shown in WDDC Council yesterday!

 I’ll be stand manager and will get some badges. I’ve booked the site just opposite the Arts Centre entrance – the best one I think. We need people please to help between 10am and 3pm – please phone me on  07990-583167  or email; publicfirstgroup@gmail.com to take a slot. And can you suggest others please?

 Many thanks.

 Cheers,

John” 

Don’t forget….Public First meeting….

 

Public First Meeting, Dorchester, voted to replace W. Dorset Cabinet govt. by Committee system

What will the public now say at the Electric Palace, Bridport?

FRIDAY 20TH FEBRUARY 7PM

Public speaks first & Panel replies…on how West Dorset District Council applies its Cabinet Government; and on whether to investigate Dorset coming under one unitary authority.

Rt Hon. Oliver Letwin, MP, Conservative; Peter Barton,   Green Party; Rachel Rogers, Labour; Ros Kayes, Lib Dems; David Glossop, UKIP; (& WDDC Executive member invited)

Chairman Clive Stafford Smith OBE.

Doors open 6pm.    

Meeting ends 9.30pm www.publicfirstgroup.c.uk

Organised by Public First Group – a non-party-political organisation

Campaign Site